Drop re-review for big grant holders

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Grant Review: American Idol or Big Brother?

ess, opting for a version of our current anonymous manuscript review system by eliminating face-to-face contact of reviewers would only serve to widen the error bars among reviews. Moreover, eliminating the face-toface discussions of study sections would have no effect on decreasing the submission-to-score time as reviews are due ?5 days before the study section meets. This is clearly not the b...

متن کامل

Self-career Management: Intervention with Research Grant Holders

This article reports the findings of the assessment of the effectiveness of a self-career management intervention, named "Self-Career Management Seminar", specifically developed for, and implemented in a group of research grant holders. The program invites participants to foster their self-knowledge, the knowledge about advanced training opportunities, employment creation and attainment, as wel...

متن کامل

STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION USING BIG BANG-BIG CRUNCH ALGORITHM: A REVIEW

The big bang-big crunch (BB-BC) algorithm is a popular metaheuristic optimization technique proposed based on one of the theories for the evolution of the universe. The algorithm utilizes a two-phase search mechanism: big-bang phase and big-crunch phase. In the big-bang phase the concept of energy dissipation is considered to produce disorder and randomness in the candidate population while in ...

متن کامل

Growing Pains for NIH Grant Review

The grant review system at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the main mechanism by which NIH identifies research worthy of support, has been through a major overhaul. Scientists who spearheaded the change say it is time to assess how the new system is working.

متن کامل

Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel

OBJECTIVE To quantify randomness and cost when choosing health and medical research projects for funding. DESIGN Retrospective analysis. SETTING Grant review panels of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. PARTICIPANTS Panel members' scores for grant proposals submitted in 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The proportion of grant proposals that were always, sometimes,...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Nature

سال: 2012

ISSN: 0028-0836,1476-4687

DOI: 10.1038/490176a